Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46.3 | 50.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | ZTE |
| Android 4.0.4 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-03-30 |
| 5.39 x 2.76 x 0.39 inches | 5.73 x 2.83 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.45 ounces | -- |
| White | -- |
| $ 155.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 854 x 480 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 245 pixels per inch | 196 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 6.4 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 304 GPU |
| 7.56 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 6.38 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.5 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1650mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2200mAh Micro SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 280 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.52 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
ZTE Tempo Go is just a bit better than the LAVA Iris 454, with a score of 50.8 against 46.3. ZTE Tempo Go's body is way lighter and a bit thinner than the LAVA Iris 454. These phones have Android operating system, but the ZTE Tempo Go has the newer 8.1 Oreo version and LAVA Iris 454 has Android 4.0.4, providing the user a couple nice extra features.
ZTE Tempo Go counts with a bit faster CPU than LAVA Iris 454, because it has more cores and 512 MB more RAM. The LAVA Iris 454 features a much more vibrant screen than ZTE Tempo Go, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 960 x 540 pixels resolution and a little bit greater amount of pixels per screen inch.
The LAVA Iris 454 captures clearer pictures and videos than ZTE Tempo Go, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (HD) video quality, the LAVA Iris 454 also has a way more mega pixels back-facing camera. The ZTE Tempo Go has a much greater memory for apps and games than LAVA Iris 454, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 32 GB, the ZTE Tempo Go also has 8 GB internal memory.
ZTE Tempo Go features greater battery lifetime than LAVA Iris 454, because it has a 33 percent more battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, ZTE Tempo Go is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.