Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 46.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.29 x 2.68 x 0.39 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.15 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 218 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Dual-Core 1300 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 7.92 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP + 0.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1750mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 23 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 3.6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 80.7, which is way better than LAVA Iris 465's 46.5 global score. The Galaxy Note 3 is a somewhat thinner but heavier phone than LAVA Iris 465. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 3 has newer 5.0 version and LAVA Iris 465 has Android 4.4.2. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a more vivid screen than LAVA Iris 465, because it has a much higher resolution of 1920 x 1080, a larger display and a way greater display density.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with much more storage for games and applications than LAVA Iris 465, because it has an external memory slot that holds up to 64 GB and 60 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note 3 features a faster processing unit than LAVA Iris 465, because it has a graphics co-processor, a higher number of cores (and also faster) and 2,5 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a really longer battery duration than LAVA Iris 465, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity against 1750mAh. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 shoots way better photographs and videos than LAVA Iris 465, because it has a camera with lot more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the LAVA Iris 465.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.