Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46.5 | 50.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | ZTE |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-03-30 |
| 5.29 x 2.68 x 0.39 inches | 5.73 x 2.83 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.15 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 854 x 480 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 218 pixels per inch | 196 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 6.4 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1300 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 304 GPU |
| 7.92 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP + 0.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 5.5 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1750mAh Battery | 2200mAh Micro SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
ZTE Tempo Go has a general score of 50.8, which is a bit better than the LAVA Iris 465's 46.5 overall score. Both phones in this review use Android OS (operating system), but ZTE Tempo Go has 8.1 Oreo version and LAVA Iris 465 has Android 4.4.2. The ZTE Tempo Go is a a bit thinner and lighter phone than the LAVA Iris 465.
LAVA Iris 465 has a better screen than ZTE Tempo Go, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have an equal 854 x 480 resolution, the LAVA Iris 465 also counts with a just a bit higher display density. The ZTE Tempo Go has a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than LAVA Iris 465, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 32 GB, the ZTE Tempo Go also has 8 GB internal storage capacity.
ZTE Tempo Go has just a little better processing power than LAVA Iris 465, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and more cpu cores. The ZTE Tempo Go has longer battery duration than LAVA Iris 465, because it has 2200mAh of battery capacity instead of 1750mAh. The ZTE Tempo Go captures much clearer photos and videos than LAVA Iris 465, because it has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
ZTE Tempo Go not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.