Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 46.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.28 x 2.60 x 0.41 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 218 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Dual-Core 1300 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 7.92 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1650mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 250 hours standby time 17.5 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 3.52 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has an overall score of 80.7, which is way better than the LAVA Iris 470's global score of 46.2. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has newer 5.0 version while LAVA Iris 470 has Android 4.2, so it gives you some nice extra features and optimized performance. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 design is somewhat heavier but somewhat thinner than the LAVA Iris 470.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a brighter screen than LAVA Iris 470, because it has a much higher 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, a lot greater screen density and a bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LAVA Iris 470, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 64 GB and 64 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a superior processing unit than LAVA Iris 470, because it has a graphics processor, a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 3 captures greater videos and photos than LAVA Iris 470, because it has a way more mega pixels camera. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much better battery lifetime than LAVA Iris 470, because it has a 94% greater battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Galaxy Note 3 is also cheap compared to the LAVA Iris 470.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.