Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | |
| Android 4.2.2 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.64 x 2.89 x 0.41 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| White | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 220 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1200 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.82 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.05 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 2.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 388 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL has an overall score of 82.5, which is much better than LAVA Iris 503's score of 46.1. Google Pixel 2 XL's design is extremely thinner but just a little bit heavier than LAVA Iris 503. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a better looking screen than LAVA Iris 503, because it has a way better 1440 x 2880 resolution, a much greater number of pixels per inch in the display and a larger display.
The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than LAVA Iris 503, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 2 XL features a superior hardware performance than LAVA Iris 503, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The Google Pixel 2 XL captures much clearer photos and videos than LAVA Iris 503, because it has a camera in the back with a way better resolution and a way higher (4K) video definition. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a much longer battery performance than LAVA Iris 503, because it has 3520mAh of battery capacity against 2000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 2 XL is also cheaper than the LAVA Iris 503, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.