Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 46.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.63 x 2.87 x 0.33 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| Gray | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 2.9 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 230 hours standby time 5.3 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is much better than the LAVA Iris 504 Q, with an 80.7 score against 46.5. Galaxy Note 3's design has the same thickness than LAVA Iris 504 Q, but it's much heavier. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 3 has newer 5.0 version and LAVA Iris 504 Q has Android 4.2, so it provides the user some extra features and performance improvements.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with just a bit better looking display than LAVA Iris 504 Q, because it has a way higher 1920 x 1080 resolution, a bit larger display and a better pixels quantity in each display inch. Galaxy Note 3 has a more powerful processing unit than LAVA Iris 504 Q, because it has more CPU cores, a higher amount of RAM memory and a graphics processing unit.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a very superior camera than LAVA Iris 504 Q, because it has a back-facing camera with much more MP. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has much more storage capacity for games and applications than LAVA Iris 504 Q, because it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 64 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a superior battery duration than LAVA Iris 504 Q, because it has a 3200mAh battery size against 2000mAh.
Galaxy Note 3 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the LAVA Iris 504 Q, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.