Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46.7 | 50.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | ZTE |
| Android 4.2 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-03-30 |
| 5.63 x 2.87 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.83 x 0.36 inches |
| Gray | -- |
| $ 155.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 854 x 480 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 220 pixels per inch | 196 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 6.4 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 304 GPU |
| 8.01 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 5.94 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.5 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 2200mAh Micro SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 230 hours standby time 5.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
ZTE Tempo Go is slightly better than LAVA Iris 506Q, getting a score of 50.8 against 46.7. These phones have Android OS, but the ZTE Tempo Go has the newer 8.1 Oreo version while LAVA Iris 506Q has Android 4.2, so it provides the user lots of additional features. The LAVA Iris 506Q has a much better looking display than ZTE Tempo Go, and although they both have a display of the same size, the LAVA Iris 506Q also has a little higher resolution of 960 x 540 and a just a little better display pixels density.
ZTE Tempo Go has a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than LAVA Iris 506Q, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 32 GB, the ZTE Tempo Go also has 4 GB more internal storage capacity. ZTE Tempo Go's processor is just as good as LAVA Iris 506Q's processing unit, and although the ZTE Tempo Go has more RAM memory, they both have a Quad-Core processing unit.
ZTE Tempo Go takes clearer photos and videos than LAVA Iris 506Q. Both have a back camera with a 5 MP. The ZTE Tempo Go features a bit superior battery duration than LAVA Iris 506Q, because it has a 2200mAh battery size.
ZTE Tempo Go not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.