Compare phones
HTC EVO 4G
PC36100| Global Score | |
| 45.8 | 50.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | HTC |
| Android 4.4 | Android 2.3, 2.2, 2.1 |
| -- | 2010-03-23 |
| 5.73 x 2.91 x 0.43 inches | 4.80 x 2.60 x 0.50 inches |
| -- | 6.00 ounces |
| Gray | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 155.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.3 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 480 x 800 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 196 pixels per inch | 217 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 7.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 QSD8650 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1300 MHz processor | Scorpion (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 512 MB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU |
| 7.92 | 7.47 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | -- |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 1.32 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 5.94 | 6.38 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 2.9 | 3.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 768 hours standby time 19 hours talk time | 6 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 3.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC EVO 4G is a bit better than LAVA Iris Fuel 25, with a 50.3 score against 45.8. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but HTC EVO 4G has older 2.3 version while LAVA Iris Fuel 25 has Android 4.4 version. The LAVA Iris Fuel 25 counts with a bit superior processor than HTC EVO 4G, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, and they both have 512 MB of RAM memory, the LAVA Iris Fuel 25 also counts with a larger number of faster cores.
LAVA Iris Fuel 25 features a bit better display than HTC EVO 4G, because although it has a just a little inferior pixel amount in each inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 854 x 480px and a bigger screen. The LAVA Iris Fuel 25 features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than HTC EVO 4G. Both of them have a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 32 GB.
The HTC EVO 4G takes a bit better photographs and videos than LAVA Iris Fuel 25, and although they both have the same 1280x720 video definition and the same video frame rate, the HTC EVO 4G also has a back camera with a lot better 8 mega pixels resolution. LAVA Iris Fuel 25 has a much better battery duration than HTC EVO 4G, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 1500mAh.
HTC EVO 4G not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.