Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 45.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | Samsung |
| Android 4.4 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.73 x 2.91 x 0.43 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| Gray | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 196 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Dual-Core 1300 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 7.92 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 2.9 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 768 hours standby time 19 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is a lot better than the LAVA Iris Fuel 25, with a score of 80.7 against 45.8. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 3 has newer 5.0 version while LAVA Iris Fuel 25 has Android 4.4 version. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a brighter screen than LAVA Iris Fuel 25, because it has a much higher resolution of 1920 x 1080, a little bit larger display and much more pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a superior processing power than LAVA Iris Fuel 25, because it has 2,5 GB more RAM memory, a higher number of faster cores and a GPU. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than LAVA Iris Fuel 25, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 64 GB and 60 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Note 3 features just a little bit longer battery duration than LAVA Iris Fuel 25, because it has a 7% more battery size. Galaxy Note 3 captures way better photographs and videos than LAVA Iris Fuel 25, because it has a back facing camera with lot more MP and a much higher video quality.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Galaxy Note 3 is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.