Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 49.7 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.70 x 2.87 x 0.37 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 196 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Quad-Core 1300 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 2.9 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 370 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a general score of 80.7, which is way better than the LAVA Iris Fuel 50's 49.7 score. Samsung Galaxy Note 3's design is just a bit heavier but thinner than the LAVA Iris Fuel 50. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version while LAVA Iris Fuel 50 has Android 4.4.2 version, providing you a couple additional features and increased performance.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much better looking screen than LAVA Iris Fuel 50, because it has a way better resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a little bit bigger screen and a lot greater pixel count per inch of display. Galaxy Note 3 counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LAVA Iris Fuel 50, because it has a SD card slot that supports up to 64 GB and 56 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Note 3 has a better processing power than LAVA Iris Fuel 50, because it has a greater amount of RAM, a GPU and 4 more cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with just a bit better battery duration than LAVA Iris Fuel 50, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Galaxy Note 3 shoots a lot better videos and photos than LAVA Iris Fuel 50, because it has a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
The Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.