Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 51.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.70 x 2.87 x 0.40 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 10.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.71 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 32 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 80.7, which is way better than the LAVA Iris Fuel 60's 51.5 general score. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 3 has a more recent 5.0 version and LAVA Iris Fuel 60 has Android 4.4.2 version, counting with a lot of extra features. Galaxy Note 3 is a thinner and just a little lighter cellphone than LAVA Iris Fuel 60.
Galaxy Note 3 features a superior processing unit than LAVA Iris Fuel 60, because it has more CPU cores, 2 GB more RAM and a graphics processing unit. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little sharper display than LAVA Iris Fuel 60, because it has a little bit larger display, a much higher 1920 x 1080 resolution and a higher pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LAVA Iris Fuel 60, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 64 GB and 56 GB more internal storage. LAVA Iris Fuel 60 features better battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 captures way better pictures and videos than LAVA Iris Fuel 60, because it has a way more mega-pixels camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.