Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 46.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | Samsung |
| Android 2.3 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 2.42 x 4.53 x 0.47 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| -- | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 7.2 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 160 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.32 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.17 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 2.8 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1300mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 3.04 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is way better than the LAVA Iris N350, having a global score of 80.7 against 46.2. Galaxy Note 3 is a extremely heavier but way thinner phone than LAVA Iris N350. Both devices we are comparing come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 3 has the newer 5.0 version and LAVA Iris N350 has Android 2.3, so it counts with some extra features and performance optimizations.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much more vibrant screen than LAVA Iris N350, because it has a lot more pixels per inch in the display, a much larger screen and a much better resolution of 1920 x 1080px. The Galaxy Note 3 features a much better performing processing unit than LAVA Iris N350, because it has an extra graphics co-processor and a larger number of cores.
The LAVA Iris N350 counts with much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 32 GB against 64 GB, it also counts with 160 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 takes a lot better pictures and videos than LAVA Iris N350, because it has a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a much better battery lifetime than LAVA Iris N350, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity against 1300mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Galaxy Note 3 is also cheaper than the LAVA Iris N350, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.