Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46.2 | 50.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | ZTE |
| Android 2.3 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-03-30 |
| 2.42 x 4.53 x 0.47 inches | 5.73 x 2.83 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 854 x 480 pixels |
| LCD | TFT |
| 165 pixels per inch | 196 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor |
| -- | 1 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 304 GPU |
| 7.2 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 160 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.32 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 5.17 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 2.8 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1300mAh Battery | 2200mAh Micro SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.04 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
ZTE Tempo Go is slightly better than the LAVA Iris N350, getting a general score of 50.8 against 46.2. The ZTE Tempo Go body is way thinner and way lighter than the LAVA Iris N350. Both of these devices use Android OS, but ZTE Tempo Go has newer 8.1 Oreo version while LAVA Iris N350 has Android 2.3.
The LAVA Iris N350 features a bit more vivid display than ZTE Tempo Go, although it has a lot worse 480 x 320 resolution, a way smaller display and a little worse screen density. The LAVA Iris N350 features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than ZTE Tempo Go, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 32 GB, the LAVA Iris N350 also has 160 GB internal storage.
ZTE Tempo Go features a superior hardware performance than LAVA Iris N350, because it has a higher number of cores (and also faster). The ZTE Tempo Go shoots much clearer videos and photos than LAVA Iris N350, because it has a way more mega-pixels back facing camera. The ZTE Tempo Go features a really longer battery performance than LAVA Iris N350, because it has 2200mAh of battery capacity.
ZTE Tempo Go is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.