Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 50 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | |
| Android 4.0.4 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 2.48 x 4.92 x 0.40 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.66 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 7.38 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 127 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.83 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 2.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 330 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is a lot better than the LAVA Iris N400, with an 82.5 score against 50. The Google Pixel 2 XL body is notably thinner but notably heavier than LAVA Iris N400. Google Pixel 2 XL has a much better looking screen than LAVA Iris N400, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 2880px, a lot more pixels per inch of display and a lot larger screen.
LAVA Iris N400 counts with a bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has only 127 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 32 GB. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a lot better performance than LAVA Iris N400, because it has a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 2 XL takes way better pictures and videos than LAVA Iris N400, because it has a back facing camera with way more megapixels. Google Pixel 2 XL has a much better battery performance than LAVA Iris N400, because it has a 3520mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Google Pixel 2 XL is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.