Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 50 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | Samsung |
| Android 4.0.4 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 2.48 x 4.92 x 0.40 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.66 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.38 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 127 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.42 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.83 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 2.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 330 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has a score of 83.3, which is much better than the LAVA Iris N400's 50 global score. Galaxy S9 is a somewhat heavier but thinner device than the LAVA Iris N400. Galaxy S9 has a much better processing power than LAVA Iris N400, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a brighter display than LAVA Iris N400, because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px, a much greater screen pixels density and a lot bigger display. Galaxy S9 has a greater camera than LAVA Iris N400, because it has a back facing camera with a lot better 12 mega pixels resolution.
The LAVA Iris N400 features a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S9, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds 368 GB smaller, it also counts with 63 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S9 counts with a superior battery duration than LAVA Iris N400, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 1500mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 costs a bit more money than the LAVA Iris N400, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.