Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | LG |
| Android 4.2.1 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.43 x 2.66 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 3.95 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 234 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX544 (384 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 400 hours standby time 7.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is much better than the LAVA Iris Pro 20, having an 81.3 score against 49.8. LG V35 ThinQ is a just a little thinner but much heavier cellphone than LAVA Iris Pro 20. The LG V35 ThinQ features a superior performance than LAVA Iris Pro 20, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a much better looking display than LAVA Iris Pro 20, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels, a larger display and a lot better count of pixels per inch in the screen. The LG V35 ThinQ has a very superior camera than LAVA Iris Pro 20, because it has a way better 3840x2160 video resolution and a back camera with a much better 16 megapixels resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better storage to install applications and games than LAVA Iris Pro 20, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has a really longer battery lifetime than LAVA Iris Pro 20, because it has a 65% bigger battery size.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more money than LAVA Iris Pro 20, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.