Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 50.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | Samsung |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.43 x 2.63 x 0.30 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.02 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR SGX544 (384 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 3.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 2.9 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 400 hours standby time 7.5 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is a lot better than the LAVA Iris Pro 30, getting an 80.7 score against 50.1. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 3 has the newer 5.0 version and LAVA Iris Pro 30 has Android 4.2.2, so it provides you a lot of extra features. Galaxy Note 3's body is extremely heavier and a little thicker than the LAVA Iris Pro 30.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a quite superior performance than LAVA Iris Pro 30, because it has more RAM memory, a faster graphics processing unit running at 600 megahertz and a greater number of faster cores. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a slightly better looking display than LAVA Iris Pro 30, because it has a little bit higher pixel quantity per inch in the display, a way better 1920 x 1080 resolution and a larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LAVA Iris Pro 30, because it has 60 GB more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 64 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 captures much better pictures and videos than LAVA Iris Pro 30, because it has a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy Note 3 has a way better battery performance than LAVA Iris Pro 30, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity instead of 2000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the LAVA Iris Pro 30.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.