Compare phones
ZTE Vital
N9810| Global Score | |
| 50.1 | 55 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | ZTE |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 4.1.2 |
| -- | 2013-06-10 |
| 5.43 x 2.63 x 0.30 inches | 5.59 x 2.81 x 0.39 inches |
| 4.02 ounces | 5.43 ounces |
| Black and Gray | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 95.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 312 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR SGX544 (384 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 5.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 3.00 MP | 13.00 MP |
| 6.49 | 6.38 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G) and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 2.9 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 2500mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 400 hours standby time 7.5 hours talk time | 15 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 4.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The ZTE Vital has a global score of 55, which is just a bit better than the LAVA Iris Pro 30's general score of 50.1. Despite being the best in this comparison, ZTE Vital's body is much heavier and noticeably thicker than LAVA Iris Pro 30. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the ZTE Vital has older 4.1.2 version and LAVA Iris Pro 30 has Android 4.2.2.
LAVA Iris Pro 30 has a little more vivid screen than ZTE Vital, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1280 x 720 pixels resolution, the LAVA Iris Pro 30 also counts with a just a little greater screen density. The ZTE Vital features a little better performance than LAVA Iris Pro 30, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the ZTE Vital also counts with a much better 400 megahertz graphics processing unit.
LAVA Iris Pro 30 features just a bit better camera than ZTE Vital, although it has a lot less MP resolution back facing camera. ZTE Vital features a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than LAVA Iris Pro 30, because it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 64 GB and 8 GB internal storage.
The ZTE Vital counts with superior battery lifetime than LAVA Iris Pro 30, because it has 2500mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the ZTE Vital is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.