Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 52 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.43 x 2.66 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.09 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Quad-Core 1500 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 3.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 2.9 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is way better than the LAVA Iris Pro 30+, with a score of 80.7 against 52. Both devices we are comparing use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has newer 5.0 version and LAVA Iris Pro 30+ has Android 4.2, providing some extra features. Even being the best in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a way heavier and just a little bit thicker phone than LAVA Iris Pro 30+.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a slightly better looking display than LAVA Iris Pro 30+, because it has a lot better resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, a larger display and a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a superior memory to install games and applications than LAVA Iris Pro 30+, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 64 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a little better performance than LAVA Iris Pro 30+, because it has an additional graphics processor, 4 more CPU cores and 2 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a way better battery life than LAVA Iris Pro 30+, because it has a 3200mAh battery size. Galaxy Note 3 has a lot better camera than LAVA Iris Pro 30+, and although they both have a 13 MP back facing camera, the Galaxy Note 3 also has a way higher 3840x2160 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the LAVA Iris Pro 30+, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.