Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52 | 57.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | |
| Android 4.2 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-25 |
| 5.43 x 2.66 x 0.31 inches | 5.76 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.09 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 312 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1500 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 7.48 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 3.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 2.9 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The TCL SIGNA has a global score of 57.2, which is a little bit better than the LAVA Iris Pro 30+'s score of 52. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but TCL SIGNA has a more recent 10 version and LAVA Iris Pro 30+ has Android 4.2 version, so it counts with some nice extra features and optimized performance. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison, TCL SIGNA is a somewhat thicker and a lot heavier cellphone than LAVA Iris Pro 30+.
LAVA Iris Pro 30+ has a more vivid screen than TCL SIGNA, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little bit worse 1280 x 720 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density. TCL SIGNA features a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than LAVA Iris Pro 30+, and although they both have equal internal storage, the TCL SIGNA also has an external memory slot that allows up to 256 GB.
TCL SIGNA has a little faster processing unit than LAVA Iris Pro 30+, and although they both have a Quad-Core CPU, the TCL SIGNA also has more RAM memory. TCL SIGNA features a bit better camera than LAVA Iris Pro 30+, because although it has a back facing camera with much less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher (Full HD) video definition.
The TCL SIGNA counts with a superior battery lifetime than LAVA Iris Pro 30+, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
TCL SIGNA not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.