Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | Samsung |
| Android 4.4 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.69 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 196 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2400mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 12 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is much better than LAVA Iris Selfie 50's score of 48.4. Galaxy A50 has a little more vivid display than LAVA Iris Selfie 50, because it has a much better amount of pixels per inch of display, a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a larger display.
Galaxy A50 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than LAVA Iris Selfie 50, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a superior processing unit than LAVA Iris Selfie 50, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A50 features a much better camera than LAVA Iris Selfie 50, because it has a lot higher (Full HD) video definition and a way more mega pixels camera in the back. The Galaxy A50 counts with a superior battery lifetime than LAVA Iris Selfie 50, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2400mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a little more expensive than LAVA Iris Selfie 50, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.