Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 48.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | Samsung |
| Windows Phone 8.1 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 4.92 x 2.53 x 0.43 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.5 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1950mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 12 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 3.84 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is a lot better than the LAVA Iris win 1, with a overall score of 80.7 against 48.2. The Galaxy Note 3 works with Android 5.0 operating system, and LAVA Iris win 1 works with Windows Phone 8.1 operating system. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a quite better performance than LAVA Iris win 1, because it has a greater number of faster cores, a larger amount of RAM and an additional GPU.
Galaxy Note 3 features a sharper screen than LAVA Iris win 1, because it has a way better 1920 x 1080 resolution, a way larger screen and a way higher screen density. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a way better camera than LAVA Iris win 1, because it has a lot more MP camera in the back. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LAVA Iris win 1, because it has 56 GB more internal storage and a SD memory slot that supports up to 64 GB.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a very superior battery lifetime than LAVA Iris win 1, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity against 1950mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is also cheaper than the LAVA Iris win 1.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.