Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 48.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | Samsung |
| Android 4.4 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.67 x 2.83 x 0.36 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 196 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Quad-Core 1300 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 2.9 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2200mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 240 hours standby time 12 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 4.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is way better than the LAVA Iris X1 Grand, with a general score of 80.7 against 48.4. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a newer 5.0 version and LAVA Iris X1 Grand has Android 4.4 version, providing the user a couple nice extra features and increased performance.
Galaxy Note 3 features a much better looking display than LAVA Iris X1 Grand, because it has much more pixels per inch in the display, a quite bigger display and a much better resolution of 1920 x 1080. The Galaxy Note 3 has a quite superior hardware performance than LAVA Iris X1 Grand, because it has 4 more processing cores, a graphics processor and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 3 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than LAVA Iris X1 Grand, because it has a back camera with way more mega-pixels and a lot better (4K) video quality. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a way bigger storage for apps and games than LAVA Iris X1 Grand, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 64 GB and more internal storage.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a very superior battery lifetime than LAVA Iris X1 Grand, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is also cheaper than the other phone, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.