Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46 | 50.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | HTC |
| Android 4.4 | Android 4.0.3 |
| -- | 0000-00-00 |
| 4.86 x 2.50 x 0.35 inches | 4.22 x 2.39 x 0.47 inches |
| -- | 3.46 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 3.5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 320 x 480 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 233 pixels per inch | 165 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.7 | 6.4 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7225A chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 512 MB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 200 (enhanced) (200 MHz) GPU |
| 8.01 | 7.02 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 4 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 3.82 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.80 aperture |
| -- | 34.00mm focal length |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 640 x 480 (VGA) video resolution |
| 5.83 | 6.27 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 2.9 | 4.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1750mAh Battery | 1230mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 3.6 | 2.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC Desire C is a bit better than LAVA Iris X1 mini, with a 50.4 score against 46. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but HTC Desire C has older 4.0.3 version while LAVA Iris X1 mini has Android 4.4 version. The LAVA Iris X1 mini counts with an incredibly better looking screen than HTC Desire C, because it has a bit bigger screen, a better pixel density and a much better resolution of 800 x 480.
The HTC Desire C and LAVA Iris X1 mini feature very similar memory for games and applications, both have equal internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 32 GB. LAVA Iris X1 mini features a greater hardware performance than HTC Desire C, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, and they both have the same RAM amount, the LAVA Iris X1 mini also counts with a higher number of cores (and they are faster).
The HTC Desire C captures slightly better pictures and videos than LAVA Iris X1 mini. Both have the same video quality, a same resolution camera in the back and the same video frame rate. The LAVA Iris X1 mini features a superior battery duration than HTC Desire C, because it has 1750mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, HTC Desire C is also a bargain compared to others, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.