Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.65 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 3.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 291 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is way better than the LAVA Iris X8, getting an 81.3 score against 54.2. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is just a little lighter and thinner than LAVA Iris X8. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better looking screen than LAVA Iris X8, because it has a larger screen, a much better count of pixels per screen inch and a way better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a better hardware performance than LAVA Iris X8, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ shoots a lot better photographs and videos than LAVA Iris X8, because it has a camera in the back with a way better resolution and a lot better (4K) video definition.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with much more memory to store more games and applications than LAVA Iris X8, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with greater battery duration than LAVA Iris X8, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more than the LAVA Iris X8, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.