Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 54.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.65 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 3.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 291 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 4.48 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is a lot better than LAVA Iris X8, getting a overall score of 80.7 against 54.2. These phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 3 has the newer 5.0 version while LAVA Iris X8 has Android 4.4.2 version. Galaxy Note 3's design is a little bit thinner but a bit heavier than LAVA Iris X8.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit better looking display than LAVA Iris X8, because it has a better number of pixels per inch in the screen, a little bit larger screen and a much higher resolution of 1920 x 1080. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit better processing unit than LAVA Iris X8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory and an additional graphics processor.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a greater camera than LAVA Iris X8, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot better 13 mega-pixels resolution and a lot higher video definition. The Galaxy Note 3 features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than LAVA Iris X8, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that supports up to 64 GB.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with superior battery duration than LAVA Iris X8, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy Note 3 is also cheaper, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.