Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lenovo | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-11-01 | 2020-11-19 |
| 7.08 x 3.49 x 0.42 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.14 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 459 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.15 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is way better than Lenovo Phab 2 Pro's overall score of 67. The Google Pixel 4a 5G design is extremely newer, lighter and a lot thinner than Lenovo Phab 2 Pro. Lenovo Phab 2 Pro has a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a just a bit greater display pixels density, a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a little bit bigger display.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has just a bit bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Lenovo Phab 2 Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Lenovo Phab 2 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G captures greater pictures and videos than Lenovo Phab 2 Pro, although it has a lot less mega-pixels camera. The Lenovo Phab 2 Pro features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 3885mAh.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G costs a bit more money than Lenovo Phab 2 Pro, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.