Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lenovo | LG |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-09-02 | 2018-06-08 |
| 7.35 x 3.80 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gray and Yellow | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 259.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 480 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a lot better than Lenovo PHAB Plus, having an 81.3 score against 62.2. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is noticeably newer, notably lighter and just a little bit thinner than Lenovo PHAB Plus. LG V35 ThinQ features a way better performance than Lenovo PHAB Plus, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better display than Lenovo PHAB Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and way more pixels per screen inch. LG V35 ThinQ has a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Lenovo PHAB Plus, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a very superior camera than Lenovo PHAB Plus, because it has a lot higher video quality and a higher 16 MP resolution camera. Lenovo PHAB Plus features a little longer battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The LG V35 ThinQ is a little more expensive than Lenovo PHAB Plus, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.