Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lenovo | LG |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-09-02 | 2020-05-15 |
| 7.35 x 3.80 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gray and Yellow | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 259.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.9 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 480 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than the Lenovo PHAB Plus, having an 87.1 score against 62.2. LG Velvet is a extremely newer and extremely lighter cellphone than the Lenovo PHAB Plus, but it is just a little bit thicker. The LG Velvet features a quite superior processing power than Lenovo PHAB Plus, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and a greater amount of RAM.
The Lenovo PHAB Plus counts with a bit better display than LG Velvet, although it has a quite lower pixels density and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080, they both have a screen of the same size. LG Velvet counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Lenovo PHAB Plus, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity.
LG Velvet counts with a greater camera than Lenovo PHAB Plus, because it has a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution. LG Velvet has superior battery lifetime than Lenovo PHAB Plus, because it has a 23 percent more battery capacity.
The LG Velvet costs a little more money than Lenovo PHAB Plus, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.