Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.2 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lenovo | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-09-02 | 2020-04-07 |
| 7.35 x 3.80 x 0.30 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Gray and Yellow | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 259.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 480 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a score of 79, which is way better than Lenovo PHAB Plus's 62.2 score. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a more recent 11 version and Lenovo PHAB Plus has Android 5.0. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's construction is a lot newer and a bit lighter than Lenovo PHAB Plus's, although it is thicker.
Lenovo PHAB Plus has a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit bigger display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Lenovo PHAB Plus, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a greater processing power than Lenovo PHAB Plus, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a way better battery duration than Lenovo PHAB Plus, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a lot better camera than Lenovo PHAB Plus, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also the cheapest one, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.