Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lenovo | LG |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-09-02 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.64 x 2.79 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.66 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black and Gray |
| Glass; aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 259.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6752 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 264 hours standby time 26 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is much better than Lenovo Vibe S1's overall score of 64. LG V35 ThinQ's body is extremely newer and a little thinner than the Lenovo Vibe S1's, although it's also heavier. The Lenovo Vibe S1 has a little sharper display than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a much lower 1920 x 1080px resolution, a little bit smaller display and a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Lenovo Vibe S1, because it has 32 GB more internal storage and a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ has a better hardware performance than Lenovo Vibe S1, because it has 3 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with greater battery lifetime than Lenovo Vibe S1, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ takes much clearer photos and videos than Lenovo Vibe S1, because it has a camera in the back with a higher 16 MP resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more money than Lenovo Vibe S1, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.