Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lenovo | LG |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.59 x 2.77 x 0.29 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gray, Red and White | Black and Gray |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1700 MHz + Quad-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.26 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is much better than the Lenovo Vibe Shot, having a overall score of 81.3 against 69.5. The LG V35 ThinQ construction has the same thickness than the Lenovo Vibe Shot, but it is a little heavier. Lenovo Vibe Shot has a little bit better display than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a just a bit inferior count of pixels per inch of display, a bit smaller display and a much lower resolution of 1920 x 1080.
LG V35 ThinQ has a little faster processor than Lenovo Vibe Shot, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU and a 32 bits processor against 64-bits, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a greater amount of RAM. The LG V35 ThinQ takes a lot better pictures and videos than Lenovo Vibe Shot. Both of them have a camera in the back with a 16 mega-pixels.
LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior memory for applications and games than Lenovo Vibe Shot, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has just a little better battery performance than Lenovo Vibe Shot, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more money than the Lenovo Vibe Shot, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.