Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.9 | 69.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lenovo | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 |
| 2015-11-25 | 2012-05-03 |
| 6.06 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 4.69 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 470.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| -- | 300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 chipset | Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1440 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU |
| 8.55 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.48 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.3 | 4.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 830 hours standby time 22.5 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S III is slightly better than the Lenovo Vibe X3, with a general score of 69.7 against 64.9. The Samsung Galaxy S III is an incredibly older device than the Lenovo Vibe X3, but Samsung managed to build it notably lighter and a bit thinner. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S III has an older 4.3 version and Lenovo Vibe X3 has Android 5.1 Lollipop version.
The Galaxy S III features a little faster processing unit than Lenovo Vibe X3, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of slower cores, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Galaxy S III features just a bit better looking display than Lenovo Vibe X3, although it has a bit smaller display, a way lower resolution of 1280 x 720 and a quite lower screen density.
Galaxy S III shoots better photographs and videos than Lenovo Vibe X3, although it has a much less megapixels resolution camera and a lot lower (Full HD) video quality. The Lenovo Vibe X3 has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 128 GB and 32 GB internal storage capacity.
The Lenovo Vibe X3 has a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a 67% larger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy S III is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.