Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.6 | 43.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Nokia |
| -- | 2012-02-27 |
| 4.13 x 1.81 x 0.51 inches | 4.54 x 2.32 x 0.53 inches |
| 2.45 ounces | 3.74 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Gray, Red and Yellow |
| $ 70.00 | $ 70.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2.4 inches |
| -- | 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) |
| -- | TFT |
| 149 pixels per inch | 167 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.4 | 6.2 |
| processor | Single-Core 1000 MHz processor |
| -- | 128 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 7.29 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 102,4 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 1.92 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 3.20 MP |
| -- | 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution |
| 0 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| CDMA | HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 3.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 1430mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 707 hours standby time 9 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 3.2 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia Asha 302 is much better than the LG 102, having a score of 43.5 against 28.6. Nokia Asha 302's construction is noticeably heavier and a bit thicker than LG 102. The Nokia Asha 302 features a better screen than LG 102, because it has a little more pixels per inch of screen. Nokia Asha 302 has a much better performing CPU than LG 102, because it has a higher number of faster cores.
Nokia Asha 302 features a way bigger memory to install games and applications than LG 102, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 32 GB. Nokia Asha 302 captures much clearer videos and photos than LG 102. The Nokia Asha 302 features a much longer battery life than LG 102.
Nokia Asha 302 costs the same than LG 102.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.