Search


Compare phones

Global Score
34.543.5
Basic Information
LGNokia
--2012-02-27
4.09 x 1.94 x 0.63 inches4.54 x 2.32 x 0.53 inches
3.60 ounces3.74 ounces
--Black, Blue, Gray, Red and Yellow
$ 70.00$ 70.00
Display / Screen
2.2 inches2.4 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
182 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.16.2
processor Single-Core 1000 MHz processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.767.29
Storage
--102,4 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
01.92
Camera
1.30 MP3.20 MP
--640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution
4.515.5
Networks
--Wi-Fi
CDMAHSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
--SIM
0.13.6
Battery Life
900mAh Li-Ion Battery1430mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
180 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
707 hours standby time
9 hours talk time
2.43.2
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 2.1, EDR

Comparison review

Nokia Asha 302 is way better than LG 290C, with a global score of 43.5 against 34.5. Nokia Asha 302's body is a little bit heavier but thinner than LG 290C. Nokia Asha 302 counts with just a bit better looking screen than LG 290C, because although it has a little lower pixel number per inch of screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 240 x 320px, the Nokia Asha 302 also counts with a little bit larger screen.

Nokia Asha 302 counts with a much powerful processor than LG 290C, because it has a greater number of faster cores. Nokia Asha 302 counts with much more storage for games and applications than LG 290C, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 32 GB. Nokia Asha 302 has a way better battery duration than LG 290C, because it has a 59% more battery capacity.

Nokia Asha 302 has a way better camera than LG 290C, because it has a much better resolution back camera.

The Nokia Asha 302 and the LG 290C cost exactly the same, making it easy to pick between these phones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.