Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 29 | 35.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | 2008-10-21 |
| 3.75 x 1.71 x 0.52 inches | 3.81 x 1.87 x 0.73 inches |
| 2.10 ounces | 4.97 ounces |
| $ 2299.00 | $ 2269.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.5 inches | 1.6 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | -- |
| STN | LCD |
| 121 pixels per inch | 115 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.4 | 5.6 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 2 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0 | 1.9 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 2.00 MP |
| 0 | 4.73 |
| GPRS and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 810mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 147 hours standby time 2.5 hours talk time | 400 hours standby time 7.3 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 2.24 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
Comparison review
Motorola AURA is way better than LG 300G, having a 35.3 score against 29. Despite being the best in our current comparison, Motorola AURA's body is a lot heavier and incredibly thicker than LG 300G. The Motorola AURA counts with a bit sharper display than LG 300G, because although it has a just a little worse pixel quantity in each inch of screen, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
Motorola AURA counts with a CPU that's just as good as LG 300G's processor, both of them have 0 processing cores. The Motorola AURA features a way better camera than LG 300G. The Motorola AURA counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than LG 300G. LG 300G has a little longer battery performance than Motorola AURA, because it has a 900mAh battery size.
The Motorola AURA not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper than the LG 300G, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.