Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 27.2 | 28.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | 0000-00-00 |
| 3.46 x 1.85 x 0.73 inches | 4.37 x 1.77 x 0.57 inches |
| 2.85 ounces | 2.82 ounces |
| $ 150.00 | $ 139.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.6 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| STN | STN |
| 82 pixels per inch | 113 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.9 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| GPRS and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 168 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 9.2 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.48 |
Comparison review
The Motorola W230 has a score of 28.8, which is a bit better than LG 410G's 27.2 overall score. Motorola W230 is a incredibly thinner and a bit lighter device than LG 410G. Motorola W230 features a processing unit that is very similar to the LG 410G one, they have a 0-Core CPU. The Motorola W230 counts with a little more vivid display than LG 410G, and although they both have an equal resolution of 128 x 128 pixels, the Motorola W230 also has a better pixel density.
Motorola W230's camera is very similar to LG 410G's camera. The Motorola W230 counts with as much storage to install applications and games as the LG 410G. Motorola W230 features a very superior battery duration than LG 410G.
Motorola W230 is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the LG 410G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.