Search


Compare phones

Samsung Chrono

SCH-R260, SCH-R261, SCH-R261A
Global Score
35.536.1
Basic Information
LGSamsung
--0000-00-00
3.58 x 1.89 x 0.71 inches3.70 x 1.83 x 0.67 inches
3.20 ounces3.14 ounces
Black--
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 85.00$ 80.00
Display / Screen
1.7 inches2 inches
--240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
235 pixels per inch200 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.46.3
processor processor
GPUARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU
5.765.94
Storage
262,14 MB internal memory--
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
0.80
Camera
1.30 MP0.30 MP
4.513.63
EDGE, GPRS and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.40.1
Battery Life
900mAh Li-Ion Battery800mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
192 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
526 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
2.42.24
Other Features
BluetoothBluetooth 2.1, EDR
--GPS

Comparison review

The Samsung Chrono is slightly better than the LG 430G, having a general score of 36.1 against 35.5. The Samsung Chrono is a a little bit lighter and a bit thinner cellphone than LG 430G. Samsung Chrono features a bit faster CPU than LG 430G, and although they both have 0 cpu cores, the Samsung Chrono also has a graphics processor.

The LG 430G features a little sharper screen than Samsung Chrono, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels quantity in each display inch. LG 430G features a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Chrono. LG 430G features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Chrono, because it has a 13% larger battery size.

The LG 430G shoots a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Chrono, because it has a back camera with much more MP.

Samsung Chrono not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the LG 430G.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.