Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.6 | 26 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Nokia |
| -- | 2005-06-03 |
| 3.49 x 1.77 x 0.99 inches | 4.09 x 1.77 x 0.67 inches |
| 3.68 ounces | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 2955.00 | $ 100.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 96 x 68 pixels |
| STN | -- |
| -- | 65 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.9 | 4.6 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| CDMA | GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 950mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 180 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 2.48 | 2.4 |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 1600 is slightly better than LG 5400 / 5400A, having a 26 score against 24.6. The Nokia 1600 construction is thinner and lighter than the LG 5400 / 5400A. Nokia 1600's processing unit is very similar to LG 5400 / 5400A's CPU, both of them have the same number of cores. The Nokia 1600 features a much more vibrant display than LG 5400 / 5400A, although it has a lot worse 68 x 96 resolution.
Nokia 1600 has a camera that's very similar to the camera in LG 5400 / 5400A. The LG 5400 / 5400A and the Nokia 1600 have incredibly similar memory capacity to install games and applications. The LG 5400 / 5400A has a bit superior battery life than Nokia 1600, because it has a 950mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Nokia 1600 is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.