Compare phones
LG A175
A175| Global Score | |
| 28.9 | 31.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 0000-00-00 | 2005-11-08 |
| 3.54 x 1.82 x 0.75 inches | 3.90 x 2.10 x 0.60 inches |
| 2.67 ounces | 3.49 ounces |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 100.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.5 inches | -- |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 176 x 220 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 121 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU | GPU |
| 5.94 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 30,72 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 1.30 MP |
| 0 | 4.51 |
| GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 950mAh Li-Ion Battery | 740mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 720 hours standby time 13 hours talk time | 215 hours standby time 3.3 hours talk time |
| 2.48 | 2.16 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.1 |
| -- | GPS |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola RAZR V3c is a bit better than LG A175, with a 31.2 score against 28.9. The Motorola RAZR V3c construction is noticeably heavier but a lot thinner than the LG A175. LG A175 features a bit better processing unit than Motorola RAZR V3c, and although they both have 0 cpu cores, the LG A175 also has an extra graphics processor.
The LG A175 has a much better screen than Motorola RAZR V3c, although it has a much lower resolution of 128 x 128. Motorola RAZR V3c counts with a very superior camera than LG A175. Motorola RAZR V3c counts with a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than LG A175. The LG A175 counts with greater battery duration than Motorola RAZR V3c, because it has a 950mAh battery capacity instead of 740mAh.
Motorola RAZR V3c not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.