Search


Compare phones

Global Score
34.838
Basic Information
LGHTC
--Windows Mobile Professional 6.1
--2008-09-16
3.93 x 2.01 x 0.62 inches4.09 x 2.32 x 0.62 inches
3.35 ounces3.88 ounces
Black--
$ 500.00$ 139.00
Display / Screen
2.2 inches2.8 inches
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
LCDTFT
128 pixels per inch143 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
5.55.7
Performance
--TI OMAP850 chipset
processor Single-Core 201 MHz processor
64 MB RAM128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.765.76
microSD, microSDHC (up to 8 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
0.760
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
4.734.73
Networks
--Wi-Fi
EDGE and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.32.7
Battery Life
Li-Ion Battery1100mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
--270 hours standby time
8 hours talk time
1.362.72
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 2.0, EDR
FM Radio--

Comparison review

HTC Touch Viva is a bit better than LG A200, getting a score of 38 against 34.8. The HTC Touch Viva is a somewhat heavier cellphone than the LG A200, but they are 0.62inches thick. HTC Touch Viva's CPU is very similar to LG A200's processor, and although the HTC Touch Viva has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have a Single-Core processor.

HTC Touch Viva counts with a little more vivid display than LG A200, because it has a little bit greater display density, a larger display and a better 320 x 240 pixels resolution. LG A200 features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC Touch Viva.

LG A200 and HTC Touch Viva feature similar cameras, both of them have a camera in the back with a 2 MP resolution. The HTC Touch Viva features a really longer battery lifetime than LG A200.

Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the HTC Touch Viva is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it a great choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.