Search


Compare phones

Global Score
33.643.5
Basic Information
LGNokia
--2012-02-27
3.56 x 1.83 x 0.72 inches4.54 x 2.32 x 0.53 inches
3.00 ounces3.74 ounces
--Black, Blue, Gray, Red and Yellow
$ 69.00$ 70.00
Display / Screen
1.8 inches2.4 inches
176 x 220 pixels 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
157 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.96.2
processor Single-Core 1000 MHz processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.767.29
Storage
--102,4 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
01.92
Camera
1.30 MP3.20 MP
--640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution
4.515.5
Networks
--Wi-Fi
CDMAHSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
--SIM
0.13.6
Battery Life
Li-Ion Battery1430mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
679 hours standby time
7.7 hours talk time
707 hours standby time
9 hours talk time
1.363.2
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 2.1, EDR
GPS--

Comparison review

The Nokia Asha 302 has an overall score of 43.5, which is way better than LG Accolade's overall score of 33.6. The Nokia Asha 302 body is heavier but noticeably thinner than the LG Accolade. Nokia Asha 302 has a little sharper screen than LG Accolade, because it has a way bigger display, a higher resolution of 240 x 320 pixels and a little bit higher count of pixels in each inch of screen.

Nokia Asha 302 counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG Accolade, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 32 GB. The Nokia Asha 302 features a much better performing processing unit than LG Accolade, because it has 1 more CPU cores. The Nokia Asha 302 features a superior battery performance than LG Accolade.

Nokia Asha 302 takes much better photographs and videos than LG Accolade, because it has a lot more MP camera.

Nokia Asha 302 costs a bit more money than LG Accolade, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.