Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-13 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.82 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.15 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is better than LG Aristo 5, having an 80 score against 68.6. Despite of the fact Google Pixel 3 is older and just a little heavier than LG Aristo 5, it's construction is still a bit thinner. Google Pixel 3 features a little bit better performance than LG Aristo 5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 3 also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 features a better display than LG Aristo 5, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels. Google Pixel 3 has a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than LG Aristo 5, because it has more internal storage.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a slightly better camera than LG Aristo 5, because although it has a camera with a worse 12.2 MP resolution, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 3 also counts with a larger back camera sensor and a much better 3840x2160 video quality. LG Aristo 5 features a little longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
The Google Pixel 3 is a little more expensive than LG Aristo 5, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.