Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.8 | 31.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | 2005-11-08 |
| 4.52 x 2.13 x 0.49 inches | 3.90 x 2.10 x 0.60 inches |
| 3.42 ounces | 3.49 ounces |
| $ 120.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.5 inches | -- |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 176 x 220 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 121 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.4 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 30,72 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 1.30 MP |
| 0 | 4.51 |
| CDMA | CDMA |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 740mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 140 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 215 hours standby time 3.3 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.16 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.1 |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
The Motorola RAZR V3c is a bit better than LG AX155, with a score of 31.2 against 28.8. The Motorola RAZR V3c body is a little heavier and thicker than LG AX155. Motorola RAZR V3c features a CPU that is just as good as the LG AX155 one, both have 0 cpu cores. The LG AX155 counts with a way better display than Motorola RAZR V3c, although it has a lot lower 128 x 128 resolution.
The Motorola RAZR V3c shoots greater photographs and videos than LG AX155. The Motorola RAZR V3c features much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG AX155. LG AX155 has just a bit better battery life than Motorola RAZR V3c, because it has an 800mAh battery capacity instead of 740mAh.
The Motorola RAZR V3c not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.