Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.8 | 31.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Nokia |
| -- | 2008-04-02 |
| 4.52 x 2.13 x 0.49 inches | 3.89 x 1.85 x 0.61 inches |
| 3.42 ounces | 3.33 ounces |
| $ 120.00 | $ 79.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.5 inches | -- |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 121 pixels per inch | 102 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.4 | 5.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32,77 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| -- | 128 x 96 video resolution |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 140 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 419 hours standby time 3.4 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.32 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0 |
Comparison review
Nokia 2680 slide is a bit better than the LG AX155, with a score of 31.2 against 28.8. The Nokia 2680 slide design is just a little bit lighter but somewhat thicker than LG AX155. LG AX155 counts with a little sharper screen than Nokia 2680 slide, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 128 x 128 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit better screen pixels density.
The Nokia 2680 slide's processing unit is just as good as the LG AX155 one, they have the same number of cores. The Nokia 2680 slide shoots way better videos and photos than LG AX155. Nokia 2680 slide counts with a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG AX155. The Nokia 2680 slide features a bit longer battery duration than LG AX155, because it has an 8 percent larger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Nokia 2680 slide is also by far the cheapest, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.