Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 56.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-07-20 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.54 x 2.82 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 196 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6582 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Single-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-400 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.74 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.05 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2540mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 480 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is much better than LG Bello II, having an 81.3 score against 56.4. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is newer and noticeably thinner than LG Bello II's, but it's a bit heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ features a lot better processing power than LG Bello II, because it has 7 more processing cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a way better looking display than LG Bello II, because it has a much higher 1440 x 2880 resolution, a much higher pixel amount per inch of display and a bigger screen. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG Bello II, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage.
LG V35 ThinQ features longer battery lifetime than LG Bello II, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2540mAh. LG V35 ThinQ shoots a lot better videos and photos than LG Bello II, because it has a back camera with a lot better 16 mega pixels resolution and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than LG Bello II, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.