Search


Compare phones

LG Cosmos 3

VN251S

Samsung Reclaim

SPH-M560
Global Score
34.636.8
Basic Information
LGSamsung
--2009-08-06
4.41 x 2.06 x 0.63 inches3.90 x 2.37 x 0.59 inches
4.58 ounces3.50 ounces
$ 99.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
2 inches2.6 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
200 pixels per inch154 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.35.9
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
1.320
Camera
1.30 MP2.00 MP
4.514.73
CDMACDMA
0.10.1
Battery Life
--1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
818 hours standby time
6.2 hours talk time
6 hours talk time
1.362.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 2.0
--GPS

Comparison review

The Samsung Reclaim has a general score of 36.8, which is slightly better than LG Cosmos 3's 34.6 overall score. The Samsung Reclaim construction is a little bit thinner and extremely lighter than the LG Cosmos 3. The Samsung Reclaim has a processor that is just as good as the processing unit in LG Cosmos 3, they have 0 cores.

The LG Cosmos 3 counts with a little bit better screen than Samsung Reclaim, because although it has a lot smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 320 x 240px, the LG Cosmos 3 also counts with a higher pixel amount per inch in the display. The LG Cosmos 3 features a much bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Reclaim.

Samsung Reclaim takes just a bit better photographs and videos than LG Cosmos 3, because it has a much more megapixels back camera. Samsung Reclaim features a very superior battery performance than LG Cosmos 3.

The Samsung Reclaim is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the LG Cosmos 3.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.