Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 31.3 | 34.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | 2009-02-16 |
| 3.80 x 1.95 x 0.76 inches | 3.70 x 1.83 x 0.73 inches |
| 3.70 ounces | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 199.00 | $ 75.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 5.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 16,38 MB internal memory | 9,22 MB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.3 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 320 x 240 (QVGA) video resolution | -- |
| 4.51 | 3.63 |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.9 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 192 hours standby time 7 hours talk time |
| 2.72 | 2.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.1 | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung E2210 is a little bit better than the LG CU500, with a overall score of 34.1 against 31.3. Samsung E2210 is a lighter and just a little bit thinner cellphone than the LG CU500. The LG CU500 and the Samsung E2210 have quite similar processors, both of them have 0 processing cores. The Samsung E2210 has an incredibly better display than LG CU500, although it has a way worse resolution of 160 x 128 pixels.
LG CU500 features a much better camera than Samsung E2210, because it has a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution. LG CU500 has a much bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung E2210, because it has 16,38 MB internal memory capacity. LG CU500 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung E2210, because it has a 38 percent more battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Samsung E2210 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.