Search


Compare phones

Samsung Chrono

SCH-R260, SCH-R261, SCH-R261A
Global Score
34.836.1
Basic Information
LGSamsung
--0000-00-00
3.78 x 1.95 x 0.72 inches3.70 x 1.83 x 0.67 inches
3.36 ounces3.14 ounces
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 90.00$ 80.00
Display / Screen
2 inches2 inches
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
141 pixels per inch200 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.76.3
processor processor
GPUARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU
5.765.94
Storage
56,32 MB internal memory--
microSD external memory slotNo SD card slot
0.50
Camera
1.30 MP0.30 MP
220 x 176 video resolution--
4.513.63
HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.90.1
Battery Life
1000mAh Li-Ion Battery800mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
400 hours standby time
3.5 hours talk time
526 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
2.562.24
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.2Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
--GPS

Comparison review

The Samsung Chrono has an overall score of 36.1, which is a bit better than the LG CU515's general score of 34.8. Samsung Chrono's construction is just a little lighter and a bit thinner than the LG CU515. The Samsung Chrono has a bit superior processor than LG CU515, and although they both have 0 cores, the Samsung Chrono also has an additional graphics processing unit.

The Samsung Chrono features a better screen than LG CU515, and although they both have a same size screen, the Samsung Chrono also has a better 320 x 240 resolution and a better pixel number in each display inch. LG CU515 has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Chrono.

LG CU515 has improved battery life than Samsung Chrono, because it has a 1000mAh battery capacity against 800mAh. LG CU515 shoots a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Chrono, because it has a lot higher 1.3 mega pixels resolution camera.

Samsung Chrono is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.