Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.6 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.0 |
| 2019-09-08 | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.78 x 2.80 x 0.33 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 4.72 ounces |
| Platinum gray | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 120.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1440 x 720 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 293 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 308 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.12 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has a global score of 71.5, which is slightly better than LG Escape Plus's 66.6 global score. Both of these devices include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has an older 4.0 version while LG Escape Plus has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy S III Cricket has a more vivid screen than LG Escape Plus, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little bit lower 1280 x 720 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher count of pixels in each screen inch.
The Galaxy S III Cricket features a little bit more memory for games and applications than LG Escape Plus, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S III Cricket also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 64 GB. Galaxy S III Cricket has just a little better processing power than LG Escape Plus, because although it has less processing cores (although they are faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy S III Cricket also counts with an extra graphics processor.
The LG Escape Plus counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the same video frame rate, the same back-facing camera sensor size and a 8 megapixels back facing camera, the LG Escape Plus also has a much bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and video in low light environments.
The LG Escape Plus counts with a much better battery duration than Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a 3000mAh battery size against 2100mAh.
Galaxy S III Cricket is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.